Which Countries Made the Biggest Strides in 2025? The Economist Weighs In with Surprising Picks

Every year, observers eagerly await insights from prestigious publications like The Economist to understand the global landscape. This year, their picks for the countries that have shown the most impressive improvements in 2025 have certainly raised eyebrows – and sparked considerable debate. According to The Economist, the two nations deserving special recognition are Argentina and Syria.

This selection might seem controversial at first glance, especially given the complex challenges both countries have faced. However, The Economist is renowned for its rigorous analysis and unique criteria, often looking beyond conventional metrics to identify genuine progress. While the exact details of their methodology are proprietary, their assessment likely delves into areas such as economic reform, political stability, social resilience, or perhaps even significant shifts in international relations or governance, that might not immediately be obvious to the casual observer.

For Argentina, this recognition could point to a turnaround in its long-standing economic struggles, perhaps through innovative policy implementations or a newfound stability that has set the stage for future growth. For Syria, a country that has endured immense turmoil, an ‘improvement’ award from such a respected body would suggest a remarkable — perhaps even miraculous — degree of rebuilding, reconciliation, or a pivotal shift towards peace and recovery, even if nascent.

Regardless of the specific reasons, being highlighted by The Economist is no small feat. As a globally leading voice, respected for its deep knowledge and sharp insights into international affairs, its endorsement carries significant weight. It not only brings global attention to Argentina and Syria but also serves as a testament to the hard work, difficult decisions, and resilience demonstrated within these nations. It challenges us to look deeper, question assumptions, and consider progress from a broader, more nuanced perspective. This year’s choices from The Economist certainly give us much to ponder about the evolving global narrative.

Source: Original Article