No New Anti-Graft Measures in VB-G RAM G, Warns LibTech India
In a significant critique of the recently introduced VB-G RAM G Act, LibTech India – a prominent consortium of academicians and activists – has voiced serious concerns, stating that the Act surprisingly contains no new provisions specifically designed to mitigate corruption. The statement, released on Saturday, underscores a glaring oversight in legislation intended to bring about substantial change.
LibTech India’s analysis highlights that this lack of fresh anti-corruption measures is particularly troubling, especially when considering the ongoing challenges with graft that often accompany large-scale public initiatives. The consortium emphasized that relying solely on existing frameworks might not be sufficient to address evolving forms of corruption or to instill greater transparency and accountability effectively.
Beyond the direct issue of anti-graft provisions, LibTech India also issued a crucial warning regarding the increasing reliance on technology in such schemes. They firmly asserted that while technology has immense potential, it “should not be the sole gateway to employment, wages, or accountability.”
This perspective from LibTech India encourages a more holistic approach to reform. It suggests that while digital tools can enhance efficiency and transparency, an over-reliance on technology as the only solution can inadvertently create new forms of exclusion, potentially marginalize those without digital access, and centralize power without adequate human oversight and robust grievance redressal mechanisms.
The consortium’s statement serves as a vital call to action for policymakers and stakeholders to re-evaluate the Act. It advocates for a comprehensive strategy that blends technological innovation with strong legal safeguards, equitable access, and genuine human accountability to ensure that programs like VB-G RAM G truly serve their intended purpose without becoming breeding grounds for corruption or exclusion.
Source: Original Article









Comments