By 
In a world grappling with complex climate challenges, it takes a brave voice to call a spade a spade. And that’s exactly what Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever did, delivering a scorching indictment of the European Union’s much-touted “green energy” agenda, branding its unwavering commitment as the “stupidity of the century.”
De Wever didn’t mince words, directly attacking what he perceives as the EU’s “dogmatic” approach to climate policy. His central warning? That these rigid, ideologically driven policies are not only failing to deliver on their promises but are actively driving up energy costs, burdening citizens and industries alike across the continent.
For too long, critics argue, the EU has pursued its ambitious climate targets with a single-mindedness that often overlooks practical realities and economic consequences. While the goal of a greener future is universally commendable, De Wever’s comments highlight a growing frustration among some European leaders regarding the *how* – specifically, the methodology and pace of the transition.
His outspoken critique serves as a stark reminder that even within the highest echelons of European politics, there’s a serious debate brewing about the efficacy and sustainability of current climate strategies. Is the pursuit of “green” at any cost truly the smartest path forward, or are European citizens being asked to pay too high a price for policies that may not be as effective as advertised?
De Wever’s powerful statement isn’t just a political soundbite; it’s a wake-up call, urging a reevaluation of an agenda that, if left unchecked, could have profound and costly implications for everyone in Europe. It prompts a vital question: when does conviction become dogma, and when does ambition turn into economic folly?
Source: Original Article
Comments